I currently have 7 certifications combined from both organizations. I have received certifications from in class boot-camps from both as well as on-demand. The following information is my opinion alone. So, the GCIH and GWAPT, Better than CeH & Net Defender? More relevant than Sec+ & Net+? My opinion is BOTH. First things that stood out to me: CeH & Practical exam had a SHOCKING amount of grammar errors, syntax, and all around cohesiveness that really demonstrated they don't have a capable or in-tune US market team. This is a well establish issue with CeH, and CompTIA has acknowledged this and taken advantage of it by adding Pen+ and highlighting US based customer service. GCIH & GWAPT -- I get it, it is pricey, and I get it now. The labs they "ship" with, albeit just custom VULNHUB VMs (now owned by OFFSEC, so we will see how that pans out...), they make it "easy" to learn the basics. Point of interest: I am currently in GPEN, and the dynamic W...
What side of the house are you on?
An information security site focused on two major sides of the security realm: Penetration Testing and Digital Forensics. Current analysis and discussion of tactics, techniques, and procedures on both sides of the house.